View credits, reviews, tracks and shop for the 1986 Vinyl release of Ultimix Volume 1 Number 1 on Discogs. PARA LOS FANATICOS DE LA MUSICA DE LOS 70´S - 80´S Y EL ROCK LATINO. Debbie Gibson(Super Ultimix) D'Train - You're The One For Me Special Dub-Vocal Edit.
When Megaupload (and some other sharehosters) died, quite a lot of interesting things just disappeared from the net.I'm talking about things like small tools that were shared on e.g. Xda-developers before Github came, about fan-mods for games etc. The 'big' ones continued living, but if you now e.g. Search for a special kernel/ROM for your G1/ADP1 you are mostly out of luck.It's sad that there's basically no way for an organisation like archive.org to archive things from sharehosters given the unclear (or quite clearly black/gray) law situation and also the missing cooperation with the sharehosters themselves. It's the same with things like game trainers, save editors, etc. Sign up and give your e-mail address to this forum so that you can see the download link for this file.
Which is an outdated version. The new version is in another forum thread on a separate forum, but you have to register to see links.
The link is to a rapidshare download page, which rest assured is totally legit.I honestly don't understand why more people don't create Github accounts and use that to distribute, or at least use their ISP's free web space. Most of these tools have names, are well-known, and are the top hit on Google, but none of them have an actual website that you can go to to see if they've released new versions, something for other games, etc.It's all very sketch. Trainers, save editors, translations are basically a common entry point into programming, like a closed knit group of people that love video games and who wants to modify/hack/translate their favourites games. At some point, programming comes to the table and people will start sharing knowledge about it with their own way of doing things. A popular project will get hosted somewhere and the following projects will get hosted there too, simply because they're learning by looking at the popular one. Rapidshare, megauploads, all of these are tools people know before getting into programming, so they just use it.
Github is something that comes later, if things get serious.Dwarf fortress stuff is like that, Minecraft is even worse, you get adfly in the middle:D. This is something that has always sketched me out about the Android rooting and moding scene. 'Download this suspect binary from rapid share and run it as root' seemed to be a cornerstone of it.The warez/cracks scene was essentially the same thing, and yet if you knew where you were getting things from, it was quite safe. The antipiracy groups have since been spreading plenty of FUD (and some possibly attaching malware to releases, I don't know) and working with the AV/security industry to make you believe otherwise, however.Just as a warez/cracks group would be called out for it and very publicly shamed if they put malware in their releases, the same would happen in the Android scene. It's true that there are many rather clueless users (known as 'leechers' in the vernacular), but there are also many knowledgeable ones and all it takes is one to give sufficient evidence of malice to trigger the 'immune reaction'. But it's even worse than that. People run random operating systems on devices they carry 24/7.
Devices with microphones, multiple cameras, access to personal and work email, text messages, passwords, your location.And there are so many places for things to wrong. Any one of the following could be malicious, incompetent, or compromised:. The ROM's maintainer. There are many groups here, for example many ROMs are based on ParanoidAndroid, which is based on Cyanogenmod, which is based on AOSP. The device maintainer.
Typically each brand/model device has its own volunteers to maintain any proprietary blobs or special upgrade process. The hackers who provide special binaries that root each device, unlock the bootloader, etc. The added packages you typically get separately from the ROM, for example Google Apps. The build machine, typically just some random box donated semi-anonymously by someone. The web hosting (without TLS, of course) provided by some other random person.I love Android. I compile and run my own ROM.
But the current scene scares the shit out of me. It's not clear to me how this differs qualitatively from the current situation with equipment manufacturers all doing their own customizations to devices. Quantitatively there's a difference - a smaller pool of devs/maintainers to potentially subvert and a much smaller pool of potential users vs. A much larger manufacturer dev team and a much larger potential pool of users.How much would it cost to buy off, for example, the entire radio hardware/firmware team at a manufacturer in your own country (meaning pretty much either China or South Korea), and on a governmental scale how reasonable or unreasonable is that number? It is too bad that these went down, but yech, sharing binaries or even entire OS images made of open source code. What if you want to change one configuration option or line of code while keeping whatever special modifications were made? What if you want to combine the changes in X fancy ROM with Y?
(Never mind that the kernel is GPL.)I'm not an Android user myself, but I will nevertheless suggest that optimally these things would be distributed as source on GitHub, with a deterministic build system guaranteed to be able to reproduce binaries in the future, and only secondarily as binaries. Hardware support specifically is often cited as one of the ways that 'desktop linux' would benefit from joe-sixpack users. That is what has always been lacking from 'desktop linux'.Hardware support in official ROMs from phone manufactures is good of course, but what is freely available to the Android community is much worse. It turns out joe-sixpack doesn't really give any shits about hardware support being open-sourced.It's nice that Google has given back some stuff, but that's peanuts compared with what the 'year of the linux desktop' meme promises. This is an interesting idea.It would work kind of like an escrow, right?
Where the 'release/publish clause' could be tied to copyright expiration or other legal events like you say.The problem I see is, how do you filter/reject the amount of stuff you would have to store without even being public? AFAIK, the IA has issues storing so much of the already-public data, so storing 'dark' (non-public/unpublished) stuff would potentially mean lots of cruft and garbage so to speak.However it does sound very interesting. I hope we can some day achieve truly permanent data storage systems were we could just dump all of this and not worry much about it again.Edit: Thinking about it a bit more, how feasible does the following sound:Anyone interested in helping the IA could buy a sort of Drobo/NAS that is able to store only IA stuff (ala Freenet). Everything is encrypted of course, and then only way to access the files is when the escrow trigger fires off, the private key is released at the IA archive and then every owner of the IA-box will have access to that particular part of the archive (as well as regular IA users through web).It's kind of like an HDD preloaded full of torrents, and then the differences or new additions can be streamed to your local IA-box as needed.
You could even filter what kind of stuff would you like to help the IA archive. For example, I'm a big fan of movies so I prioritize that category (up to a certain% so that no one category is forgotten).Does anyone know if anything resembles this? I mean, I could very well leave a low-powered NAS to help the IA serve their content, store it for later use, etc. And I imagine (hope) that a lot of other people would too. It would be a way of donating electricity, space to a worthy cause. Does anyone know if anything resembles this? I mean, I could very well leave a low-powered NAS to help the IA serve their content, store it for later use, etc.
And I imagine (hope) that a lot of other people would too. It would be a way of donating electricity, space to a worthy cause.The Internet Archive serves torrent files for every object they store, so in theory, anyone could have a NAS that would crawl those torrent files and then join the swarm/seed for all of those objects.That would be a hell of an open source project. The Internet Archive would then be a metadata repository and seeder of last resort. The same is true within the styles of music that I like. It was compounded by the fact the other centralized file hosts, like Rapidshare and Mediafire, were forced to delete TONS of content on the same day that Megaupload folded.There are many obscure demos, rehearsals, etc.
That disappeared from the internet and most haven't reappeared since. I knew some bloggers who had uploaded probably in the range of 5000-10000 old metal demos, and these guys were careful to not post copyrighted material, but it seemed like if they got even a single strike against their account, everything was deleted.I hope someone imaged those servers, otherwise a lot of that content might be lost forever. Even as an indie software developer, this makes me sad.Rapidshare was the most responsive to copyright complaints out of all the filesharing sites, they took down links within 2 hours of being reported.
But instead of nuking cracks to my software on Rapidshare immediately, it meant I let the Rapidshare links stay alive longer, because I knew I could turn them off whenever I wanted. I'd rather people uploaded cracks to RapidShare where I could see how popular / unpopular a link was & had control over when to remove it, than somewhere like MegaUpload that would deliberately take a long time to remove links.I never saw evidence of piracy helping sales (always hurt sales) and I never used it for promotion, but I was more worried about cracks that came bundled with a virus, or that came bundled with a collection of illegal images. That stuff had to be nuked straight away for the protection of customers (and since much of the time, customers never understood that cracks don't come from the company that makes the software). Yup, I get some support requests where I have to explain to the customer that they never bought the software. They'll tell me the Photoshop Tutorial they downloaded my software from, inevitably with a link to a Rapidshare download. They're not looking at URLs and might not even understand they're downloading from a different website to the tutorial. Some have told me they got my software from 'a Photoshop Tutorial that you advertised your software on'.
Ugh.It's worth noting that while I have customers of all ages, many are older / elderly (many in their late 60s and a few in their 80s & 90s). They're not the most tech savvy, they don't understand the cracking scene & some need a lot of time-consuming handholding. Often wonderful & friendly folks, but they don't grok computers the same way the usual Hacker News reader will. Torrentfreak has some good editorializing and context around this shutdown:'Hoping to clear up its image the company made tremendous efforts to cooperate with copyright holders and limit copyright infringements. Among other things, the company adopted one of the most restrictive sharing policies while (re)branding itself as a personal cloud storage service.' The anti-piracy measures seemed to work, but as a result RapidShare’s visitor numbers plunged. The dwindling revenues eventually cost most of RapidShare’s employees their jobs.'
Well a file sharing platform got popular due to file sharing taking place, sort of obvious isn't it. Then those who built an industry out of controlling distribution who are threatened by these new ways use their acquired power to shut down the threat by claiming copyright infringement, stuttering history (see 17th century french button makers, 19th century theatrophone, and so on).Thing is sharing is a human trait, a trait required to live in a social group. The internet is about sharing and either the copyright industry will adapt/disappear or the internet will disappear (probable eaten alive by fecesbookians and politicians). Rapidshare died because the market moved on. 'File hosting services' like rapidshare have been replaced by cutthroat 'cyberlockers' like Keep2share and rapidgator.The most successful cyberlockers do what Rapidshare decided not to: pay uploaders, even those who share illegally. And also pay linking sites through referral schemes far more resilient legally.
They aren't trying to appease anyone not either a customer or a very active uploader. Working with copyright owners beyond base legal requirements (DMCA et al) isn't the business plan anymore. Getting into bed with copyright owners was megaupload's and rapidshare's first mistake. The new plan is to make as much money is possible then abandon the ship the moment the MPAA looks their way.Filesharers are ok with this. They purchase monthly subscriptions in full knowledge that the service might disappear any day. They aren't looking for a long term relationship anymore.
Ultimix 139 Rapidshare Video
The blind panic resulting from the megaupload raid ended that expectation. I partly disagree with this. It's true that there is a crowd of uploaders who do it for profit, but Putlocker/Firedrive discontinued their affiliate system in 2012 and continued to be one of the most popular file hosts (yes, they closed down now but that's because they operated in the uk and had issues). Zippyshare also remains very popular when it doesn't pay uploaders either. Vkontakte is another popular file sharing site in addition to 4shared (but 4shared recently started being very strict to copyrighted files).Argubly one could argue that megaupload was mainly used by non-profit uploaders.
Download ebook gratis indonesia. Gratis-ebooks-downloaden.nl Op Gratis-ebooks-downloaden.nl vind je links naar gratis ebooks in diverse genres en formaten. Deze kun je eenvoudig op je ereader of smartphone openen en lezen. Lees meer Actuele gratis e-books via Twitter Een overzicht van actuele gratis e-books, die aangeboden worden via Twitter. De lijst wordt continu ververst! Jaarlijks worden de Hongerspelen uitgevaardigd: 24 door loting aangewezen tributen, een jongen en een meisje uit elk district, gaan een strijd op leven en dood met elkaar aan. En dit jaar wordt Prim uitgeloot Katniss weet dat de Hongerspelen een doodvonnis voor haar jonge zusje betekenen en besluit haar plek in.
It gained popularity with affiliates but afterwards the average person and non-profit uploaders used the website to upload files more than the affiliate users. I believe you had to become a premium member to actually gain access to the rewards feature.Rapidshare died because not only did they combat copyrighted files, they also blocked the ability to share legit files. As pointed out in the comments elsewhere in this thread, they tried to out-Dropbox Dropbox.edit: also, Mediafire before they went all-cloud had no affiliate system and is very popular. And look at Mega.co.nz, a very popular website which is used for movies etc.
I've interviewed an ex rapidshare employee some time ago.Might have been just one disgruntled ex employee, but they told me the CEO wouldn't hand out access to the servers to anyone and insisted on keep doing that himself and other stuff.They weren't competent though, so maybe he just didn't want to give that employee access. I asked them what they did at Rapidshare and the only answer I got was 'multicore stuff' (sic).However it seemed inviteable, Rapidshare tried to rebrand to a personal cloud storage provider without providing the features needed to be one while still cracking down on piracy.Maybe they should have pulled a dotcom, shut rapidshare down and announce rapid. And then stick to the old business model.
Funkymix Blogspot
They also refused to change their name. The founder wouldn't rebrand. They had a decent chance, if you think about it: storage know-how, a bunch of servers, some good techies, and - which could have been the killer - a Swiss location with Swiss data privacy laws, right in the Snowden era. Forget Dropbox and google drive and amazon with the NSA tapping into them here and wherever. Could have been a great selling point. But the owner couldn't face 'swissshare' or 'swissbox' or something else.
Ultimix Records
Had to keep Rapidshare with all that implied. Hi,I came across this thread whilst searching for info on File Hosting and there's certainly a lot of good information here.I'm writing an app that uploads small documents to public file hosting sites (e.g. Via REST-HTTP Post) so that others can download them again, preferably via simple HTTP GET.Rather than coding to a particular API for each and every Hosting site, are there any public code libraries (preferably C or C#) that do this already presenting a common API across a number of different supported hosting sites?Ideally I'd be looking for an Apache/MIT license code rather than GNU.